California
State University San Marcos
College
of Education
EDMS
522 - Elementary Literacy
Spring Semester 2012
|
Instructor:
Alice M.L. Quiocho, Ed.D. Professor
|
Office
Location: University Hall 327
|
|
Class
Hours: 8:30 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.
Tutoring: 8:30 – 9:15 A.M.
|
Office
Phone: (760) 750-4035
|
|
Class
Location: Bonsall Elementary
|
Office
Hours: After class or upon request
|
|
Email: aquiocho@csusm.edu
|
|
College of
Education Mission Statement
The mission of the College of Education Community is to
collaboratively transform public education by preparing thoughtful educators
and advancing professional practices. We are committed to diversity,
educational equity, and social justice, exemplified through reflective
teaching, life-long learning, innovative research, and on-going service. Our
practices demonstrate a commitment to student-centered education, diversity,
collaboration, professionalism and shared governance.
(adopted
by COE Governance Community, October 1997)
GENERAL
CONSIDERATIONS
Outcomes and Standards
The
context for, and scope of this course is aligned with standards for the
Cross-cultural Language and Academic Development (CLAD) endorsement, as
articulated by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC), and as
approved by the faculty of the College of Education in development of the
program approval documents. (Note: As of 2002, the CLAD competencies are
collectively referred to as an Authorization
to Teach English Learners.) Further consideration has been given to the
alignment of standards for multicultural education as articulated by the
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), the Interstate
New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC), and the National Board
for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS).
Emphasis is placed on learning outcomes (what you know and can
demonstrate) rather than on inputs (putting in “seat time”, meeting minimum
criteria for assignments, checking off tasks and activities), and how these
outcomes correspond to your potential to enhance student learning as a new
teacher.
Ability
Every
student has the right to equitable educational consideration and appropriate
accommodation. Students having differing
ability (mobility, sight, hearing, documented learning challenges, first
language/English as a second language) are requested to contact the professor
at the earliest opportunity. Every
effort will be made to accommodate special need. Students are reminded of the availability of
Disabled Student Services, the Writing Center, technology assistance in the
computer labs, and other student support services available as part of
reasonable accommodation for special needs students.
All University Writing
Requirement
Every course at the university must have a writing
requirement of at least 2500 words. This
will be met through written course assignment such as case studies, written
reactions and assessments.
CSUSM Academic Honesty Policy
“Students
will be expected to adhere to standards of academic honesty and integrity, as
outlined in the Student Academic Honesty Policy. All written work and oral presentation
assignments must be original work. All
ideas/materials that are borrowed from other sources must have appropriate
references to the original sources. Any
quoted material should give credit to the source and be punctuated with
quotation marks.
Students
are responsible for honest completion of their work including
examinations. There will be no tolerance
for infractions. If you believe there
has been an infraction by someone in the class, please bring it to the
instructor’s attention. The instructor
reserves the right to discipline any student for academic dishonesty in
accordance with the general rules and regulations of the university. Disciplinary action may include the lowering
of grades and/or the assignment of a failing grade for an exam, assignment, or
the class as a whole.”
Incidents
of Academic Dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Students. Sanctions at the University level may include
suspension or expulsion from the University.
Plagiarism:
As
an educator, it is expected that each
student will do his/her own work, and contribute equally to group projects and
processes. Plagiarism or cheating is
unacceptable under any circumstances. If
you are in doubt about whether your work is paraphrased or plagiarized see the
Plagiarism Prevention for Students website http://library.csusm.edu/plagiarism/index.html. If there are questions about academic
honesty, please consult the University catalog.
Appeals
Every student has the right to appeal grades, or appeal for
redress of grievances incurred in the context of any class. Disputes may be
resolved informally with the professor, or through the formal grades appeal
process. For the latter, consult Dr. Kelly, Associate Dean.
Students with Disabilities Requiring Reasonable
Accommodations
Students
are approved for services through the Disabled Student Services Office
(DSS). The DSS Office is located in
Craven Hall 5205, and can be contacted by phone at (760) 750-4905 or TTY (760)
750-4909. Students authorized by DSS to
receive reasonable accommodations should meet with their instructor during
office hours or, in order to ensure confidentiality, in a more private setting.
Attendance Policy
Due to the dynamic and interactive nature of EDMS 521 and the
short time span in which the course is offered, all students are expected to
attend all classes and participate in all class activities. Each day absent is equal to two class
sessions on a regular course schedule. A
passing grade will not be issued for students who do not attend 80% or more of
the class sessions. Should the student have extenuating circumstances, s/he
should contact the instructor as soon as possible. (Adopted by
the COE Governance Community, December, 1997)
COURSE DESCRIPTION
The
primary aim of this course is for students to develop an understanding of the
theory, methodology and assessment of English language arts and second language
learning in integrated and inclusive K-8 school classrooms. This class is aligned with the California
2042 standards.
COURSE
PREREQUISITE
Admission
to the Multiple Subject/CLAD Teacher Credential Program.
STANDARDS
ALIGNMENT
The
course objectives, assignments, and assessments have been aligned with the CTC
standards for Multiple Subjects Credential.
Please be sure to incorporate artifacts from this class into your final
comprehensive portfolio. The following
standards are a primary emphasis in this course:
Standard
3- Relationship between theory and practice
Standard
4-Pedagogical thought and reflective practice
Standard
5-Equity, Diversity, & Access tot he Core Curriculum
Standard
7-Equity, Preparation to Teach Reading Language Arts
TEACHER PERFORMANCE
EXPECTATIONS (TPE) COMPETENCIES
This
course is designed to help teachers seeking the Multiple Subjects Credential to
develop the skills, knowledge, and attitudes necessary to assist schools and
district in implementing an effective programs for all students. The successful candidate will be able to
merge theory and practice in order to realize a comprehensive and extensive
educational program for all students.
The following TPE’s are addressed in this course:
Primary
Emphasis
TPA,
Task 3
OBJECTIVES
KNOWLEDGE
Teacher
candidates will:
gain an understanding of how a first and second
language is acquired.
gain an understanding of the reading process and its
relationship to thought, language and learning.
gain an understanding of how people learn to read
and write in their first and second language
become familiar with current approaches to the
teaching of reading and writing and the theoretical bases of such approaches.
become familiar with current approaches to the
teaching of reading and writing in culturally and linguistically diverse
elementary school classrooms
become familiar with classroom diagnostic techniques
and evaluation procedures.
become familiar with current approaches to the
teaching of reading and writing to children with special learning needs
SKILLS
Teacher
candidates will:
become sensitive observers of children's language
using behaviors.
analyze children's reading and writing behavior as a
basis for making instructional decisions
translate the results of formal and informal assessment
of children's reading and writing behaviors into instructional plans
develop the ability to select appropriate materials
and instructional strategies to meet the individual needs of students
learn how to organize the classroom for teaching
reading and writing to culturally and linguistically diverse populations.
ATTITUDES
AND VALUES
Teacher
candidates will:
·
develop an appreciation for the natural language abilities children
possess for processing and producing print
·
develop an appreciation for the need and value of integrating reading
and writing into all areas of the curriculum
·
affirm the importance of a rich environment for developing an effective
language arts program.
·
develop a sensitivity to and appreciation for culturally and
linguistically diverse learners.
·
develop a sensitivity to and appreciation for children with special
learning needs
·
develop an appreciation for the importance of reading and writing for
their own personal and professional growth
·
develop a respect for each student, his/her abilities and background
and the student's right to instruction that meets his or her individual needs.
REQUIRED
TEXTS
Johns, J. (2005). Basic
Reading Inventory: Pre-primer through grade twelve & early literacy
assessments. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall-Hunt.
Reading/language Arts Framework for CA Public Schools CA Dept of Ed – available
online
Vacca & Vacca
Howard, RTI
Quiocho & Ulanoff
Course
Requirements
All
students are expected to participate in class activities and demonstrate
reflective learning. It is important
that students are well prepared for course sessions by completing the readings
and assignments scheduled before the class meeting. Unless otherwise negotiated with the
instructor, all assignments are to be handed in (i.e., posted onWebCT as attachments) on the due date. Assignments
not posted on WebCT on the due date will lose 10% of earned credit per day.
·
Attendance and participation 25
points
·
Case Assessment, TPA 75
points
Grading
A 96–100%
A- 90–95%
B+ 89-87%
B 86-83%
B-
80–82%
C+ 77-79%
C 73-76%
C- 70-73%
ASSIGNMENTS:
Case Study (Critical
Assessment Task) TPA. Final Copy Due Date: March 8 on WebCT. In this assignment you will observe
students reading, listen to them read and make instructional decisions for interventions
based on your observations and assessments. Use the Assessment Grid developed in class during the first semester.
Requirements are listed below.
Expository Text and Expanded Case Study
Follow these steps to develop your case study:
- Select an intermediate student (if
possible, if not, see me) at your site who is experiencing difficulties
with reading.
Explain the assessment project to your cooperating teacher, and ask
her/him to help you identify students: second language learners or student with an
active IEP. Discuss possible times for giving the
assessments. You will probably need to meet with the student about 3 or 4
times, minimum. Obtain written parental
permission to work with this student. (Letter attached)
Note that if you have not been placed
in an upper grade (3 through 6) and it is appropriate for your student, you
will use the Developmental Assessments in the John’s book in the Appendices.
2. Required
Assessments:
- Take four objective
anecdotal notes about the student’s interests and participation.
- Reading/Writing
interview
- Oral language
assessment
- Writing sample
- John’s word list
- John’s narrative
passages
- Retelling and
comprehension questions
- John’s expository
passages
- Retelling and
comprehension questions
- Optional assessments – only if
needed.
(a) Silent
Reading. Use Johns’ narrative and expository passages. Expository will be
used only if your student is at or above grade 3 level.
(b) Optional: Listening
Level. This is to be used when you
find that data collected in the oral as well as the silent samples do not
reveal consistent information.
Read a passage to the student (form C) and ask for a retelling as well
as comprehension questions to determine the highest level of understanding the
student has of material read to them.
3. Required
components of the case study:
· Write a
one-page overview about your
student (including his/her age, gender, grade level, interests, ethnic and
linguistic background, etc).
· Describe
the conditions under which
the assessment was administered.
· Analyze the data in a grid
format.
·
For each assessment measure, summarize what you learned about your
student’s strengths (very important
– what s/he can do) and needs (what s/he needs to work on).
·
Identify patterns that you may see
across assessment results.
· Make and write
up two instructional recommendations
or strategies, describing each strategy step by step.
·
Note how each
strategy will help your student become a better reader and writer.
·
Reflect on
your learning Address the following:
·
What you learned about entry level, progress monitoring and
summative assessment?
·
Were there any unexpected occurrences? What did you do?
·
What would you change?
Time? Supports?
·
How will you use assessment in the future to inform instruction?
Attendance Policy
Due to the
dynamic and interactive nature of EDMS 522, all students are expected to attend
all classes and participate in all class activities. For every day of absence, students will lose
6 points. Attendance will be taken during the first
5 minutes of class. Three tardies or
“early exits” will be equivalent to one absence. A
passing grade will not be issued for students who do not attend 80% or more of
the class sessions. Should the student have extenuating circumstances, s/he
should contact the instructor as soon as possible.
Course Outline
(Timeline Subject to Change Based on
Student Needs) Remember that your
textbooks are resources and you should have them with you in class. We will go over sections in the text that
support what we are learning. Use the
index as a guide to help you get all you information you need about the
topic(s) for the class.
Readings to be assigned in Class
|
Date
|
Topic
|
Assignment
|
|
Session 1:
A.M.
1/25/10
|
Connecting semester 1
with semester Language Development: Dr
Lori Heisler
|
Assessment grids developed last semester
|
|
Session 1:
P.M.
|
Assessment
Autism: Dr. Jodi Robledo
|
John’s Basic Reading
Inventory: Begin case study work - Workshop
|
|
Session 2:
A.M.
2/1/10
|
RICA warm up
Assessment
Content area reading and
writing
|
Johns, Workshop
Assessment grid
|
|
Session 2:
P.M.
.
|
Assessment
Content area reading and
writing
|
Cde.ca.gov
Learner.org
Workshop
|
|
Session 3: A.M.
2/8/10
|
RICA warm up
Assessment
Writing workshop
|
Johns – IRI
Vacca and Vacca TBA
|
|
Session 3:
P.M.
|
Assessment
Literary response and
analysis
|
Johns
Vacca & Vacca TBA
|
|
Session 4:
A.M.
2/15/10
|
RICA warm up
Assessment
Independent reading
|
Vacca & Vacca TBA
Power Point
Common Content Standards
|
|
Session 4:
P.M.
|
RICA
Assessment
Integrating reading,
writing, and oral language
|
Power Point
Vacca & Vacca TBA
Quiocho& Ulanoff
|
|
Session 5:
A.M.
2/22/10
|
RICA warm up
Assessment
Grade level access for
ELL’s
Aligning materials
|
Cde.ca.goc
Power Point
Quiocho& Ulanoff
|
|
Session 5:
P.M.
|
Assessment
Supporting grade level
access in writing
|
Learner.org
Vacca & Vacca
Quiocho& Ulanoff
|
|
Session 6:
A.M.
3/1/10
|
RICA warm up
Assessment
Focusing on specific genres
of writing: standards based units
Developing rubrics
|
Johns
Assesment grid model
Power Point
|
|
Session 6:
P.M.
|
RICA
Assessment
Academic oral language
development and its relationship to writing
|
Ced.ca.gov
Vacca & Vacca
Quiocho & Ulanoff
|
|
Session 7:
A.M.
3/8/10
|
RICA warm up
Assessment
Vocabulary
|
Vacca & Vacca
Power Point
Quiocho & Ulanoff
|
|
Session 7:
P.M.
|
RICA
Assessment
Study Skills
Evaluations
|
Learner.org
Power Point
|
|
Session 8: Work
|
Case studies due
|
Small group feedback
|
|
Session 8: Work.
|
Final Postings for projects
due
|
Course evaluations
Summary
|
Authorization
to work with English Learners Competencies
PART 1:
LANGUAGE STRUCTURE
AND FIRST- AND
SECOND-LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT
|
PART 2: METHODOLOGY
OF BILINGUAL, ENGLISH LANGUAGE
DEVELOPMENT,AND
CONTENT INSTRUCTION
|
PART 3:
CULTURE AND
CULTURAL DIVERSITY
|
|
I. Language Structure and Use:
Universals and Differences
(including the structure of
English)
|
2. Theories and Methods of Bilingual Education
|
I.
The Nature 3. Culture
|
|
*A. The sound systems of language (phonology)
|
A. Foundations
|
A.
Definitions of culture
|
|
*B. Word formation (morphology)
|
B. Organizational models: What works for whom?
|
B.
Perceptions of culture
|
|
*C. Syntax
|
*C. Instructional strategies
|
C. Intragroup differences (e.g., ethnicity,
race, generations, and micro-cultures)
|
|
*D. Word meaning (semantics)
|
II. Theories and Methods for Instruction In and
Through English
|
D. Physical geography and its effects on
culture
|
|
*E. Language in context
|
A. Teacher delivery for both English
language development and content instruction
|
E. Cultural congruence
|
|
*F. Written discourse
|
B. Approaches with a focus on English language
development
|
II. Manifestations of Culture: Learning About Students
|
|
*G. Oral discourse
|
*C. Approaches with a focus on content area
instruction (specially designed academic instruction delivered in English)
|
*A. What teachers should learn
about their students
|
|
*H. Nonverbal communication
|
D. Working with paraprofessionals
|
*B. How teachers can learn
about their students
|
|
II. Theories and Factors in First- and
Second-Language Development
|
III. Language and Content Area Assessment
|
*C. How teachers
can use what they learn about their students (culturally responsive pedagogy)
|
|
A. Historical and current theories and models
of language analysis that have implications for second-language development
and pedagogy
|
A. Purpose
|
III. Cultural Context
|
|
B. Psychological factors affecting first- and
second-language development
|
*B. Methods
|
A. Concepts of cultural contact
|
|
C. Socio-cultural factors affecting first- and
second-language development
|
C. State mandates
|
B. Stages of individual cultural contact
|
|
*D. Pedagogical factors affecting first- and
second-language development
|
E. Limitations of assessment
|
C. The dynamics of prejudice
|
|
E. Political factors affecting first- and
second-language development
|
E. Technical concepts
|
D. Strategies for conflict resolution
|
EDMS 522
stresses competencies highlighted in bold. Authorization to teach English
Language Learners.
No comments:
Post a Comment