Quote of the week:

Tell me and I will forget,
Show me and I will learn,
Involve me and I will understand
Teton Lakota (Indian saying)

Search This Blog

EDMS 522 Literacy


California State University San Marcos
College of Education

EDMS 522 - Elementary Literacy

Spring Semester 2012


Instructor:  Alice M.L. Quiocho, Ed.D.  Professor
Office Location: University Hall 327
Class Hours: 8:30 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.
Tutoring:  8:30 – 9:15 A.M.
Office Phone:  (760) 750-4035
Class Location:  Bonsall Elementary
Office Hours: After class or upon request
Email:  aquiocho@csusm.edu



College of Education Mission Statement

The mission of the College of Education Community is to collaboratively transform public education by preparing thoughtful educators and advancing professional practices. We are committed to diversity, educational equity, and social justice, exemplified through reflective teaching, life-long learning, innovative research, and on-going service. Our practices demonstrate a commitment to student-centered education, diversity, collaboration, professionalism and shared governance.
                                                            (adopted by COE Governance Community, October 1997)

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

Outcomes and Standards
The context for, and scope of this course is aligned with standards for the Cross-cultural Language and Academic Development (CLAD) endorsement, as articulated by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC), and as approved by the faculty of the College of Education in development of the program approval documents.  (Note:  As of 2002, the CLAD competencies are collectively referred to as an Authorization to Teach English Learners.) Further consideration has been given to the alignment of standards for multicultural education as articulated by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), the Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC), and the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS).  Emphasis is placed on learning outcomes (what you know and can demonstrate) rather than on inputs (putting in “seat time”, meeting minimum criteria for assignments, checking off tasks and activities), and how these outcomes correspond to your potential to enhance student learning as a new teacher.

Ability
Every student has the right to equitable educational consideration and appropriate accommodation.  Students having differing ability (mobility, sight, hearing, documented learning challenges, first language/English as a second language) are requested to contact the professor at the earliest opportunity.  Every effort will be made to accommodate special need.  Students are reminded of the availability of Disabled Student Services, the Writing Center, technology assistance in the computer labs, and other student support services available as part of reasonable accommodation for special needs students.


All University Writing Requirement
Every course at the university must have a writing requirement of at least 2500 words.  This will be met through written course assignment such as case studies, written reactions and assessments.


CSUSM Academic Honesty Policy
“Students will be expected to adhere to standards of academic honesty and integrity, as outlined in the Student Academic Honesty Policy.  All written work and oral presentation assignments must be original work.  All ideas/materials that are borrowed from other sources must have appropriate references to the original sources.  Any quoted material should give credit to the source and be punctuated with quotation marks.

Students are responsible for honest completion of their work including examinations.  There will be no tolerance for infractions.  If you believe there has been an infraction by someone in the class, please bring it to the instructor’s attention.  The instructor reserves the right to discipline any student for academic dishonesty in accordance with the general rules and regulations of the university.  Disciplinary action may include the lowering of grades and/or the assignment of a failing grade for an exam, assignment, or the class as a whole.”

Incidents of Academic Dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Students.  Sanctions at the University level may include suspension or expulsion from the University.

Plagiarism:
As an educator, it is expected that each student will do his/her own work, and contribute equally to group projects and processes.  Plagiarism or cheating is unacceptable under any circumstances.  If you are in doubt about whether your work is paraphrased or plagiarized see the Plagiarism Prevention for Students website http://library.csusm.edu/plagiarism/index.html.  If there are questions about academic honesty, please consult the University catalog.

Appeals
Every student has the right to appeal grades, or appeal for redress of grievances incurred in the context of any class. Disputes may be resolved informally with the professor, or through the formal grades appeal process. For the latter, consult Dr. Kelly, Associate Dean.

Students with Disabilities Requiring Reasonable Accommodations
Students are approved for services through the Disabled Student Services Office (DSS).  The DSS Office is located in Craven Hall 5205, and can be contacted by phone at (760) 750-4905 or TTY (760) 750-4909.  Students authorized by DSS to receive reasonable accommodations should meet with their instructor during office hours or, in order to ensure confidentiality, in a more private setting.

 

Attendance Policy

Due to the dynamic and interactive nature of EDMS 521 and the short time span in which the course is offered, all students are expected to attend all classes and participate in all class activities.  Each day absent is equal to two class sessions on a regular course schedule. A passing grade will not be issued for students who do not attend 80% or more of the class sessions. Should the student have extenuating circumstances, s/he should contact the instructor as soon as possible.  (Adopted by the COE Governance Community, December, 1997)

COURSE DESCRIPTION

The primary aim of this course is for students to develop an understanding of the theory, methodology and assessment of English language arts and second language learning in integrated and inclusive K-8 school classrooms.  This class is aligned with the California 2042 standards.


COURSE PREREQUISITE
Admission to the Multiple Subject/CLAD Teacher Credential Program.

STANDARDS ALIGNMENT

The course objectives, assignments, and assessments have been aligned with the CTC standards for Multiple Subjects Credential.  Please be sure to incorporate artifacts from this class into your final comprehensive portfolio.  The following standards are a primary emphasis in this course:

Standard 3- Relationship between theory and practice
Standard 4-Pedagogical thought and reflective practice
Standard 5-Equity, Diversity, & Access tot he Core Curriculum
Standard 7-Equity, Preparation to Teach Reading Language Arts

TEACHER PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE) COMPETENCIES

This course is designed to help teachers seeking the Multiple Subjects Credential to develop the skills, knowledge, and attitudes necessary to assist schools and district in implementing an effective programs for all students.  The successful candidate will be able to merge theory and practice in order to realize a comprehensive and extensive educational program for all students.  The following TPE’s are addressed in this course:

Primary Emphasis
TPA, Task 3

OBJECTIVES

KNOWLEDGE

Teacher candidates will:
gain an understanding of how a first and second language is acquired.
gain an understanding of the reading process and its relationship to thought, language and learning.
gain an understanding of how people learn to read and write in their first and second language
become familiar with current approaches to the teaching of reading and writing and the theoretical bases of such approaches.
become familiar with current approaches to the teaching of reading and writing in culturally and linguistically diverse elementary school classrooms
become familiar with classroom diagnostic techniques and evaluation procedures.
become familiar with current approaches to the teaching of reading and writing to children with special learning needs
           

SKILLS

Teacher candidates will:
become sensitive observers of children's language using behaviors.
analyze children's reading and writing behavior as a basis for making instructional decisions
translate the results of formal and informal assessment of children's reading and writing behaviors into instructional plans
develop the ability to select appropriate materials and instructional strategies to meet the individual needs of students
learn how to organize the classroom for teaching reading and writing to culturally and linguistically diverse populations.

ATTITUDES AND VALUES

Teacher candidates will:
·       develop an appreciation for the natural language abilities children possess for processing and producing print
·       develop an appreciation for the need and value of integrating reading and writing into all areas of the curriculum
·       affirm the importance of a rich environment for developing an effective language arts program.
·       develop a sensitivity to and appreciation for culturally and linguistically diverse learners.
·       develop a sensitivity to and appreciation for children with special learning needs
·       develop an appreciation for the importance of reading and writing for their own personal and professional growth
·       develop a respect for each student, his/her abilities and background and the student's right to instruction that meets his or her individual needs.

REQUIRED TEXTS 


Johns, J. (2005). Basic Reading Inventory: Pre-primer through grade twelve & early literacy assessments. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall-Hunt.
Reading/language Arts Framework for CA Public Schools CA Dept of Ed – available online
Vacca & Vacca
Howard, RTI
Quiocho & Ulanoff


Course Requirements


All students are expected to participate in class activities and demonstrate reflective learning.  It is important that students are well prepared for course sessions by completing the readings and assignments scheduled before the class meeting.  Unless otherwise negotiated with the instructor, all assignments are to be handed in (i.e., posted onWebCT as attachments) on the due date.  Assignments not posted on WebCT on the due date will lose 10% of earned credit per day.

·       Attendance and participation                     25 points
·       Case Assessment, TPA                               75 points


Grading

A         96–100%        
A-        90–95%                      
B+        89-87%
B          86-83%
B-             80–82%
C+        77-79%
C          73-76%
C-        70-73%











ASSIGNMENTS:



Case Study (Critical Assessment Task)  TPA.   Final Copy Due Date: March 8 on WebCT.  In this assignment you will observe students reading, listen to them read and make instructional decisions for interventions based on your observations and assessments. Use the Assessment Grid developed in class during the first semester. Requirements are listed below.

Expository Text and Expanded Case Study
Follow these steps to develop your case study:

  1. Select an intermediate student (if possible, if not, see me) at your site who is experiencing difficulties with reading. Explain the assessment project to your cooperating teacher, and ask her/him to help you identify students:  second language learners or student with an active IEP.  Discuss possible times for giving the assessments. You will probably need to meet with the student about 3 or 4 times, minimum. Obtain written parental permission to work with this student. (Letter attached)
Note that if you have not been placed in an upper grade (3 through 6) and it is appropriate for your student, you will use the Developmental Assessments in the John’s book in the Appendices.

2. Required Assessments:
  • Take four objective anecdotal notes about the student’s interests and participation.
  • Reading/Writing interview
  • Oral language assessment
  • Writing sample
  • John’s word list
  • John’s narrative passages
  • Retelling and comprehension questions
  • John’s expository passages
  • Retelling and comprehension questions
  • Optional assessments – only if needed.
(a)   Silent Reading. Use Johns’ narrative and expository passages. Expository will be used only if your student is at or above grade 3 level.
(b)  Optional: Listening Level.  This is to be used when you find that data collected in the oral as well as the silent samples do not reveal consistent information.  Read a passage to the student (form C) and ask for a retelling as well as comprehension questions to determine the highest level of understanding the student has of material read to them.

3. Required components of the case study:
·      Write a one-page overview about your student (including his/her age, gender, grade level, interests, ethnic and linguistic background, etc).
·      Describe the conditions under which the assessment was administered.
·      Analyze the data in a grid format.  
·      For each assessment measure, summarize what you learned about your student’s strengths (very important – what s/he can do) and needs (what s/he needs to work on).
·      Identify patterns that you may see across assessment results.
·      Make and write up two instructional recommendations or strategies, describing each strategy step by step.
·                                          Note how each strategy will help your student become a better reader and writer.
·                                          Reflect on your learning  Address the following:
·      What you learned about entry level, progress monitoring and summative assessment?
·      Were there any unexpected occurrences?  What did you do?
·      What would you change?  Time?  Supports?
·      How will you use assessment in the future to inform instruction?

 

Attendance Policy


Due to the dynamic and interactive nature of EDMS 522, all students are expected to attend all classes and participate in all class activities.  For every day of absence, students will lose 6 pointsAttendance will be taken during the first 5 minutes of class.  Three tardies or “early exits” will be equivalent to one absence.  A passing grade will not be issued for students who do not attend 80% or more of the class sessions. Should the student have extenuating circumstances, s/he should contact the instructor as soon as possible.


Course Outline
(Timeline Subject to Change Based on Student Needs)  Remember that your textbooks are resources and you should have them with you in class.  We will go over sections in the text that support what we are learning.  Use the index as a guide to help you get all you information you need about the topic(s) for the class.
Readings to be assigned in Class

Date

Topic
Assignment
Session 1:  A.M.
  1/25/10

Connecting semester 1 with semester Language Development:  Dr Lori Heisler

Assessment grids developed last semester
Session 1:  P.M.

Assessment
Autism:  Dr. Jodi Robledo
John’s Basic Reading Inventory: Begin case study work - Workshop

Session 2:  A.M.
2/1/10 
RICA warm up
Assessment
Content area reading and writing
Johns, Workshop
Assessment grid
Session 2:  P.M.
  .
Assessment
Content area reading and writing
Cde.ca.gov
Learner.org
Workshop
Session 3:  A.M.
  2/8/10
RICA warm up
Assessment
Writing workshop
Johns – IRI
Vacca and Vacca TBA
Session 3:  P.M.

Assessment
Literary response and analysis
Johns
Vacca & Vacca TBA

Session 4:  A.M.
2/15/10
RICA warm up
Assessment
Independent reading
Vacca & Vacca TBA
Power Point
Common Content Standards
Session 4:  P.M.

RICA
Assessment
Integrating reading, writing, and oral language

Power Point
Vacca & Vacca TBA
Quiocho& Ulanoff
Session 5:  A.M.
2/22/10
RICA warm up
Assessment
Grade level access for ELL’s
Aligning materials

Cde.ca.goc
Power Point
Quiocho& Ulanoff
Session 5:  P.M.

Assessment
Supporting grade level access in writing
Learner.org
Vacca & Vacca
Quiocho& Ulanoff

Session 6:  A.M.
3/1/10
RICA warm up
Assessment
Focusing on specific genres of writing:  standards based units
Developing rubrics
Johns
Assesment grid model
Power Point


Session 6:  P.M.

RICA
Assessment
Academic oral language development and its relationship to writing
Ced.ca.gov
Vacca & Vacca
Quiocho & Ulanoff
Session 7:  A.M.
3/8/10
RICA warm up
Assessment
Vocabulary
Vacca & Vacca
Power Point
Quiocho & Ulanoff
Session 7:  P.M.

RICA
Assessment
Study Skills
Evaluations

 

Learner.org
Power Point
Session 8:  Work
Case studies due

 Small group feedback

Session 8:  Work.
Final Postings for projects due

Course evaluations
Summary

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Authorization to work with English Learners Competencies


PART 1:

LANGUAGE STRUCTURE

  AND FIRST- AND SECOND-LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

PART 2:         METHODOLOGY

OF BILINGUAL, ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT,AND

CONTENT INSTRUCTION

PART 3:
CULTURE AND
CULTURAL DIVERSITY
I.  Language Structure and Use:
Universals and Differences
(including the structure of English)
2.  Theories and Methods of Bilingual Education
I.  The Nature    3.       Culture
*A.  The sound systems of language (phonology)
A.  Foundations
A.  Definitions of culture
*B.  Word formation (morphology)
B.  Organizational models: What works for whom?
B.  Perceptions of culture
*C.  Syntax
*C.  Instructional strategies
C.  Intragroup differences (e.g., ethnicity, race, generations, and micro-cultures)
*D.  Word meaning (semantics)
II.  Theories and Methods for Instruction In and Through English
D.  Physical geography and its effects on culture

*E.  Language in context
A.  Teacher delivery for both English language development and content instruction

E.  Cultural congruence
*F.  Written discourse
B.  Approaches with a focus on English language development
II.  Manifestations of Culture:  Learning About Students
*G.  Oral discourse
*C.  Approaches with a focus on content area instruction (specially designed academic instruction delivered in English)
*A. What teachers should learn about their students
*H.  Nonverbal communication
D.  Working with paraprofessionals
*B. How teachers can learn about their students
II.  Theories and Factors in First- and Second-Language Development
III.  Language and Content Area Assessment
*C. How teachers can use what they learn about their students (culturally responsive pedagogy)
A.  Historical and current theories and models of language analysis that have implications for second-language development and pedagogy

A.  Purpose
 
III.  Cultural Context
B.  Psychological factors affecting first- and second-language development
*B.  Methods
A.  Concepts of cultural contact
C.  Socio-cultural factors affecting first- and second-language development
C.  State mandates
B.  Stages of individual cultural contact
*D.  Pedagogical factors affecting first- and second-language development
E.  Limitations of assessment
C.  The dynamics of prejudice
E.  Political factors affecting first- and second-language development
E.  Technical concepts
D.  Strategies for conflict resolution
EDMS 522 stresses competencies highlighted in bold. Authorization to teach English Language Learners.

No comments:

Post a Comment